A Manifesto


We admire and seek to defend the distinctive and irreplaceable architecture that speaks of Birmingham's history in the second half of the Twentieth Century.
We have been provoked into action by the loss of a number of fine buildings of the 1970s- The Post and Mail, the Central Library, and the NatWest Tower.
We believe that that the public have been influenced by the use of phrases such as "1960s concrete monstrosity" and we aim to inform and enable the people of Birmingham to appreciate the best of 20th century design and architecture.
We accept that the Council wants to improve the economic fortune of the City; however this has resulted in indiscriminate demolition. We believe the time has come to stem the time of indiscriminate demolition of any building of this period and to look afresh at the best of what remains.
We aim to rescue the terms 'Modernist' and 'Brutalism' from those who would use them to write off Modernist buildings. We view Modernism as an ethical approach to design in which the form of the building strictly follows its function.
We believe that the best buildings of the period are honest, strong and full of character.
From our unique position we can provide an independent voice and become an information repository for this period of Birmingham's architectural history.

(Alan Clawley & Mary Keating March 2018)

Monday, 12 March 2018

Colmore Row- what makes it so special?

Colmore
Have you ever wondered why the Colmore Row Business District has such an eclectic mix of architecture? The answer may lie in the fact that it was spared the worst of WW2 bombing and remains one of the most architecturally intact areas of Birmingham. The “new” buildings of the 1960s and 1970s follow simple modernist patterns, are of good quality and did fit perfectly with their older neighbours.
An interesting aspect of development in the Colmore District, unlike many other parts of the city, is the care and comparative restraint with which it is being developed. Is this a blueprint for how the conservation of all periods of architecture could be handled by the planners? Possibly.
Today we showcase a number of modernist buildings of different styles, some of them beautifully conserved, others having been “developed” resulting in the tragic loss of their original Modernist integrity.
Starting your walk on Great Charles Street near its junction with Newhall Street, you will find two very different versions of Modernist style. Number 40, Great Charles Street, Devonshire House, designed by Essex, Goodman and Suggit in 1954 takes a form that harks back to Art Deco. Above the striking portico of classical columns rises an unmistakably Modernist-style central panel of windows and vertical fins in Portland stone, framed by a set-back surround of stone with inset windows.
In contrast, No 36, Great Charles Street, by Elden Minns & Partners, built in 1973, has a rich facade of Inca-patterned cast-concrete panels. We love the vibrancy and the fun expressed in this detail. These buildings hold their own amid the grandiosity of their surroundings and both seem quite free from the "prettification" that has befallen other Modernist buildings we encountered.
Continuing up Newhall Street you will find Nos 12 to 22, Edmund House, designed in 1962-3 by Fitzroy Robinson & Partners. Herbert Fitzroy Robinson was a prolific architect who collaborated with Sir Basil Spence in the design of a number of Modernist and Brutalist buildings of note. Edmund House was eleven storeys of Portland stone, windows and pale grey infill panels which made it a simple, pleasing building until a truly ugly, three storey portico and dark cladding was added some time in the 1980s, turning a quiet, well-proportioned building into something akin to a 1950’s juke box. Across the road, No 11, Newater House, is well worth a look, another simple building with soaring metal fins framing an elegant rhythm of windows and stone panels. Here "improvements” of stone cladding and an unsuitable glass and steel fan-shaped canopy are less intrusive and the quality of the building can still be appreciated.
A detour down Edmund Street will take you to No 120. This wonderful building is faced with Portland stone framing a simple, clean grid of windows atop a broad pediment and balconies with inset railings which run the whole width. All together a sophisticated, if understated piece of architecture unfortunately now somewhat compromised by the addition of a heavy granite wall and pillars. Masking the original central portico is yet another steel and glass canopy.
Back on Newhall Street you cannot miss the large gap next to Edmund House. This was the site of the Nat West Tower designed by renowned Birmingham architect John Madin. Architectural critic Andy Foster described the building as being "the most important Brutalist commercial building in the city”. Now obliterated to make way for “Birmingham’s tallest new tower ".
Emerge on to Colmore Row, a magnificent sweep of Victorian and Edwardian buildings and opposite, the beautiful, leafy, vibrant open space that frames St Philips Cathedral. Beyond the cathedral, on Temple Row stands No 55, originally the Bank of England building and certainly one of the finest Brutalist buildings we have left. This unashamedly Brutalist building has presence writ large, standing four-square on a raised podium. The monumental rhythm of stone caissons framing large rectangular windows, tied together with copper clad beams is crowned with a muscular pediment which echoes the Art Deco period and eloquently expresses the strength and power of its original purpose. The quality of the building materials is evident in the combination of Portland stone with panels of Fossiliferous Limestone which adds a unique texture to the whole. Designed by Fitzroy Robinson & Partners in 1969, it was one of three similar Bank of England buildings, the others in Newcastle and Manchester.
This walk, a fascinating voyage of discovery, shows what can be done with our heritage buildings without demolishing or spoiling them with glass and plastic cladding. For the most part developers have managed to satisfy modern business needs with imagination and ingenious solutions which have added some lovely ultra-modern spaces and efficient buildings while preserving the historic character of the area. Could this be a blueprint for how we should approach the conservation of all our built environment? To quote Council leader Ian Ward (Post 15/2/18) "This is a city with a rich and proud history and it is absolutely essential to invest in our heritage and never forget the past". That past also includes gems from the post-war period. We are after all only temporary custodians of our built environment.


No comments:

Post a Comment