A Manifesto


We admire and seek to defend the distinctive and irreplaceable architecture that speaks of Birmingham's history in the second half of the Twentieth Century.
We have been provoked into action by the loss of a number of fine buildings of the 1970s- The Post and Mail, the Central Library, and the NatWest Tower.
We believe that that the public have been influenced by the use of phrases such as "1960s concrete monstrosity" and we aim to inform and enable the people of Birmingham to appreciate the best of 20th century design and architecture.
We accept that the Council wants to improve the economic fortune of the City; however this has resulted in indiscriminate demolition. We believe the time has come to stem the time of indiscriminate demolition of any building of this period and to look afresh at the best of what remains.
We aim to rescue the terms 'Modernist' and 'Brutalism' from those who would use them to write off Modernist buildings. We view Modernism as an ethical approach to design in which the form of the building strictly follows its function.
We believe that the best buildings of the period are honest, strong and full of character.
From our unique position we can provide an independent voice and become an information repository for this period of Birmingham's architectural history.

(Alan Clawley & Mary Keating March 2018)

Thursday, 14 June 2018

The end of an era




House of Fraser seems to have found itself in many rather interesting buildings throughout the country. Take Beatties in Wolverhampton as an example...

A fabulous modernist construction that was once Rackhams in Birmingham, (I remember my then boyfriend's mother telling me how much she loved shopping there) it is to close by the spring 2019. 

What will happen to it? Can it be reused, will it be saved or knocked down to be reborn as a dull glass clad office/retail experience?

What should we do with our high streets, and the buildings that inhabit them, and how can we preserve the best of 20th century architecture for the future?

Do tell us what you think!



Monday, 4 June 2018

Frederick Gibberd. A reluctant Modernist?


Frederick Gibberd in the news....
Do let us know what you think about his architecture. Not just this, but other work by him.


Corporation Square
This iconic architecture is at risk. Frederick Gibberd’s only piece of architecture left in the city where he trained.
Andy Foster in 'Birmingham' describes it as:
'a cool Portland stone podium with carefully placed slit windows over a recessed ground floor. Plant rooms treated as rectangular sculptural masses, with vertical slots linking visually to the podium: an early hint of late Corbusier in the city.'
Brutiful Birmingham has applied to list it. Please show your support for this and help campaign to save it.
Photo by Frankie Finlay.

Saturday, 12 May 2018

Alan Clawley- a tribute by Joe Holyoak, architect and urban designer

Alan Clawley, 4 December 1943-30 April 2018.

We are very grateful to Joe Holyoak, architect and urban designer, for allowing us to publish the obituary he wrote for Alan, that was published last week in the Birmingham Post.


Alan Clawley, who has died from cancer at the age of 74, was an environmental and social activist and campaigner who spent the last 43 years of his life dedicated to various causes in Birmingham. Alan was an architect, educated at the Architectural Association in London, although he did not pursue conventional architectural practice after 1973. He graduated from the AA in 1969, and the route that his professional allegiances and activities took is typical of his generation.

1969 was the high point of orthodox modernism in architecture and planning – the idea that we could build the world anew, rejecting the past and starting boldly from scratch. But it was also the point at which the consensus on modernism began to crack apart, and from which alternative philosophies were developed, leading to very different and more diverse forms of practice in the 1970s. The path that Alan chose reflected this shift in culture.

After graduation, an enthusiastic modernist, Alan worked first for Runcorn New Town Corporation, on a housing scheme of 2,000 concrete dwellings, and then for the Greater London Council, on expanded towns in the southeast and east Anglia. He became disillusioned by the realisation that he was designing new dwellings for thousands of people whom he never met, and about whom he knew nothing. This mechanistic mass production of buildings, in which the occupants played no part, was replaced for Alan by the practices of community architecture and planning, in which the inhabitants are engaged in the process, playing a central and active role.

In Alan’s own words, the terms which defined his life from 1973 onwards were “community, public participation, localness and smallness of scale”; all characteristics absent both from his architectural education and from his employment in Runcorn and London.

One of the forms of practice which replaced large-scale modernist production in the early 70s was the government’s Inner Area Studies, which included a focus on local character, and promoted the improvement of older housing instead of its wholesale clearance and replacement. One of the pioneering studies was based in Small Heath; in 1975 Alan came to Birmingham, joined the team running the study, from the architecture and planning firm Llewellyn-Davies Weeks Forestier-Walker, and continued to live in Small Heath until his death.

The house in which Alan lived with his wife Hazel, whom he married in 1972, was itself illustrative of his social and economic beliefs. The Clawleys joined the Small Heath Park Housing Co-operative, which built a cluster of houses for its members, completed in 1984. They were Green Party members from the same time, regularly standing as candidates in local wards at council elections, including last week’s election, where Alan stood in Bordesley Green.


The community technical aid movement, which flourished during the 70s and 80s, made the professional services of people like architects accessible to sectors of society previously distant from them. In Birmingham the Inner City Partnership Programme funded Community Networks and the Digbeth Trust, for whom Alan acted as community technical aid worker between 1984 and 1992, enabling many community groups to obtain design and development advice.

Alan was born in Liverpool. His parents were Salvation Army officers, and Alan moved several times with them as they were allocated new posts around the country. It is likely that Alan gained much of his social conscience and his inherent asceticism from his upbringing by them. Alan was a quiet and modest man, but fiercely principled, and willing to fight for a cause he believed in.

In recent years he became best-known for his passionate championing, as the secretary of the Friends of the Central Library, which he co-founded, of John Madin’s 1974 building. It is perhaps surprising, on the face of it, that someone dedicated to post-modern modes of community advocacy, and small-scale and local grassroots development, should be so passionate about a monumental piece of modern concrete Brutalism.

But it was in fact all of a piece. Alan admired the Central Library’s rigour, austerity and honesty, as well as its ethical virtues of architecture in public service. As a Green Party activist, he was also opposed to the wasteful destruction of a building which could be reused. Alan was a keen mountain walker, seeking out elevated rocky landscapes, and also greatly attracted by Norman cathedrals. It is perhaps not fanciful to see Alan responding to tough characteristics in Madin’s library that were similar to what he found in those places.

Alan was not afraid to challenge power and authority, and systematically countered the various dubious arguments put forward by the council and developers for the library’s demolition. Through his advocacy he became a great admirer of John Madin, and wrote his biography, published in 2011. He later wrote “Library Story”, the history of the Central Library and its eventual fate (2016). In between he wrote “Batsfords Birmingham Then and Now” (2013).

At his death he had completed the draft of a book on the history of planning and architecture in Birmingham from the 19th century onwards, and I hope to see this edited and published.

Alan leaves his wife Hazel, their children Jonathan and Alison, and two grandchildren.

Alan Clawley, born 4th December 1943, died 30th April 2018.

Wednesday, 9 May 2018

A tribute to Alan Clawley from his tenor friends

THOUGHTS ON A TENOR BY HIS FELLOW TENORS.
ALAN CLAWLEY, AN APPRECIATION.
 
Alan was greatly appreciated for his friendship and was very welcoming of new tenors. He was a committed member of the choir, always volunteering for extra events. He had a self-effacing manner and a ready wit, a flashing intellect and kindness. His natural musical ability and lyrical tenor voice made him a mainstay of the tenor section. He showed great courage and had an ability to lighten the burden around the most serious of occurrences, even his illness. He was a very interesting man to talk to and if you were feeling jaded on Wednesday evening you could count on Alan not to be. He would come to choir full of stories about the perceived idiocy of building and planning decisions in Birmingham. Indeed, he had a great knowledge of the changes which have happened and wrote a book about them. He would tell you tales of his life as an orchestral trombonist, or about the hills he had recently tramped over, often several at a time and with Hazel.
 
 
He felt strongly about many things but was not one to bear a grudge, instead he would see the funny side of situations and he enjoyed a good argument if you disagreed with him. He had a lovely sense of humour and a smile to match and when he laughed his eyes would twinkle. He brought life and cheerfulness to rehearsals, concerts and on tour. He will be greatly missed and leaves a big gap in our band of tenors.
 
REST IN PEACE ALAN, WE WON’T FORGET YOU.

Thursday, 3 May 2018

sad news

tribute to Alan

Very sad news about the person who really made Brutiful Birmingham happen. We owe so much to him.

We will write more in due course but felt we needed to share what is in the public domain. We all at Brutiful deeply mourn Alan's loss and remember him with great fondness and respect. Right now we're just very sad.

Monday, 12 March 2018

Brutiful Action group's 'Away Day' to Edgbaston ...

On 8th February the Brutiful Action group met for the day at the rather attractive leafy hidden building that is Edgbaston Friends Meeting House. There we demolished delicious bread and cheese, fruit, cake and copious tea and coffee while working out how this passionate group should proceed into the future and how we can protect and speak up for post WWII architecture in Birmingham.

Over the coming months we hope to bring you lots more news about what the group is up to, and how you can get involved. In the meantime, have a giggle at some photos.... most interestingly we each had to bring a photo of our favourite post modernist building- which meant for us everything from a Le Coubusier building to the National Theatre, Churchill College to Wolverhampton School of Art.





Colmore Row- what makes it so special?

Colmore
Have you ever wondered why the Colmore Row Business District has such an eclectic mix of architecture? The answer may lie in the fact that it was spared the worst of WW2 bombing and remains one of the most architecturally intact areas of Birmingham. The “new” buildings of the 1960s and 1970s follow simple modernist patterns, are of good quality and did fit perfectly with their older neighbours.
An interesting aspect of development in the Colmore District, unlike many other parts of the city, is the care and comparative restraint with which it is being developed. Is this a blueprint for how the conservation of all periods of architecture could be handled by the planners? Possibly.
Today we showcase a number of modernist buildings of different styles, some of them beautifully conserved, others having been “developed” resulting in the tragic loss of their original Modernist integrity.
Starting your walk on Great Charles Street near its junction with Newhall Street, you will find two very different versions of Modernist style. Number 40, Great Charles Street, Devonshire House, designed by Essex, Goodman and Suggit in 1954 takes a form that harks back to Art Deco. Above the striking portico of classical columns rises an unmistakably Modernist-style central panel of windows and vertical fins in Portland stone, framed by a set-back surround of stone with inset windows.
In contrast, No 36, Great Charles Street, by Elden Minns & Partners, built in 1973, has a rich facade of Inca-patterned cast-concrete panels. We love the vibrancy and the fun expressed in this detail. These buildings hold their own amid the grandiosity of their surroundings and both seem quite free from the "prettification" that has befallen other Modernist buildings we encountered.
Continuing up Newhall Street you will find Nos 12 to 22, Edmund House, designed in 1962-3 by Fitzroy Robinson & Partners. Herbert Fitzroy Robinson was a prolific architect who collaborated with Sir Basil Spence in the design of a number of Modernist and Brutalist buildings of note. Edmund House was eleven storeys of Portland stone, windows and pale grey infill panels which made it a simple, pleasing building until a truly ugly, three storey portico and dark cladding was added some time in the 1980s, turning a quiet, well-proportioned building into something akin to a 1950’s juke box. Across the road, No 11, Newater House, is well worth a look, another simple building with soaring metal fins framing an elegant rhythm of windows and stone panels. Here "improvements” of stone cladding and an unsuitable glass and steel fan-shaped canopy are less intrusive and the quality of the building can still be appreciated.
A detour down Edmund Street will take you to No 120. This wonderful building is faced with Portland stone framing a simple, clean grid of windows atop a broad pediment and balconies with inset railings which run the whole width. All together a sophisticated, if understated piece of architecture unfortunately now somewhat compromised by the addition of a heavy granite wall and pillars. Masking the original central portico is yet another steel and glass canopy.
Back on Newhall Street you cannot miss the large gap next to Edmund House. This was the site of the Nat West Tower designed by renowned Birmingham architect John Madin. Architectural critic Andy Foster described the building as being "the most important Brutalist commercial building in the city”. Now obliterated to make way for “Birmingham’s tallest new tower ".
Emerge on to Colmore Row, a magnificent sweep of Victorian and Edwardian buildings and opposite, the beautiful, leafy, vibrant open space that frames St Philips Cathedral. Beyond the cathedral, on Temple Row stands No 55, originally the Bank of England building and certainly one of the finest Brutalist buildings we have left. This unashamedly Brutalist building has presence writ large, standing four-square on a raised podium. The monumental rhythm of stone caissons framing large rectangular windows, tied together with copper clad beams is crowned with a muscular pediment which echoes the Art Deco period and eloquently expresses the strength and power of its original purpose. The quality of the building materials is evident in the combination of Portland stone with panels of Fossiliferous Limestone which adds a unique texture to the whole. Designed by Fitzroy Robinson & Partners in 1969, it was one of three similar Bank of England buildings, the others in Newcastle and Manchester.
This walk, a fascinating voyage of discovery, shows what can be done with our heritage buildings without demolishing or spoiling them with glass and plastic cladding. For the most part developers have managed to satisfy modern business needs with imagination and ingenious solutions which have added some lovely ultra-modern spaces and efficient buildings while preserving the historic character of the area. Could this be a blueprint for how we should approach the conservation of all our built environment? To quote Council leader Ian Ward (Post 15/2/18) "This is a city with a rich and proud history and it is absolutely essential to invest in our heritage and never forget the past". That past also includes gems from the post-war period. We are after all only temporary custodians of our built environment.